|
|
||||||||||
| Home . 1998 Best . 1999 Best . 2000 Best . 2002 Best . 2003 Best . 2004 Best . 2006 Best . adventure . Animation . Biblical . Book . comedy . Documentary . drama . Esperanto . Essays . family . Fantasy . historical . Horror . Mixed Literature . Musical . Mystery . Novel . Novella . Play . Poetry . Romance . sci-fi . Short stories . Technical . TV . Western . all | ||||||||||
For myself, if I’d been there and had heard Jeanne scream at Orleans: “If you love me … follow me!” I would have followed without hesitation. The Story of Joan of Arc
I suppose, again, that there’s no accounting for tastes. I enjoyed the film immensely, and was enthralled for two and a half hours. My wife Angela fell asleep about three quarters of the way through, finding it long, boring and drawn-out. Supposedly I give nothing away if I say that the movie begins with a young girl finding a sword in a field and having visions, and ends with a bonfire in the marketplace at Rouen. In the meantime we see her (Jeanne, here called Joan in the English-language fashion, played by Milla Jovovich) convincing the Dauphin Charles of France (John Malkovich) to provide her with an army to relieve the siege of Orleans (a process that seems to take over half the film), failing to convince the new King Charles of France to provide her with an army to retake Paris, being betrayed to the Burgundians, being turned over to the English, being tried, being tortured, and having fortunately not-overlong discussions with an enigmatic and to all others invisible monk-like figure (Dustin Hoffman). Luc Besson, who made the film, not too surprisingly treats the English occupiers quite unsympathetically (the French of the period felt much the same way about them, calling them “bigods” and “godams” for their language, a facet of their culture that Besson makes quite evident in the film). The most complex characters are, surprisingly, some of the members of the ecclesiastical court that tries Jeanne; a few of them appear to be trying to find a way out for her, though others seem to be most upset that she is intruding on their special and unique relationship with God. The most likeable character is the young student-turned-archer Gilles (Vincent Cassel — did I get this right?), a minor member of Charles’s court who is assigned as her constant companion and protector, and who evidently falls in love with her. Unfortunately, when I checked the credits in the IMDB I discovered his full name — Gilles de Rais, a name which would later become synonymous with the word “monster.” (1) Other French officers are largely folks with “funny hats” rather than full-fledged characters, though the Duke of Alençon’s exasperated resignation is rather enjoyable. Yolande of Aragon (Faye Dunaway) seems to exist only to manipulate her malleable son-in-law Charles in any direction he doesn’t seem to want to go. Hoffman’s role confuses me, and I am still not sure what he was meant to be. IMDB names him “The Conscience,” but he struck me as, more likely, an agent of Satan, attempting to convince Jeanne that her messages from God were nothing more than the left side of her brain attempting to impose some kind of rationality on the stimuli coming from a chemical imbalance in the right side, so give it all up, kid. Though at the end, his actions suggest that he might also be an agent of God himself. Maybe there’s no difference… All in all, I liked this film, and would recommend it to anyone who is willing to sit through two and a half hours of costume historical for the sake of a good story. For myself, if I’d been there and had heard Jeanne scream at Orleans: “If you love me … follow me!” I would have followed without hesitation. One caveat: if you can’t stand the sight of blood (heads and arms being lopped off, etc.), avoid this film like the plague. (1) Besson’s association of de Rais with Jeanne, though the two were contemporaries, is not supported by my historical reference (Durant’s The Story of Civilization), though she would almost certainly have met him at Charles’s court. But it was one of the mainstays of H. Warner Munn’s delightful 1970s fantasy Merlin’s Ring; Munn has de Rais turning to satanic child sacrifice in despair after Jeanne’s death. Don Harlow, November 21, 1999 04:46 PM Feedback
Leave a comment
|
Latest Reviews
» La Kiso
» Katrina malfruas » Inter tero kaj ĉielo » La nokta patrolo 2 » Moskvaj sonoriloj » Beletra Almanako » La bato » Sonetoj » Shrek the Third » Enlumiĝo » All reviews
Sign up
Sign up now to receive a notification
Subscribe to this site using an RSS (XML) news aggregator (?): » Full reviews » Review excerpts
Other sites
About this site
All rights reserved. Promotional images are displayed under fair use for review purposes only and are held under copyright by their respective owners. This site uses MT 3.15 Site templates and design © Gwen Harlow for her dad. |
|||||||||
| Don Harlow bio info. Born longer ago than he cares to admit, Don Harlow has worked as a military weather forecaster, neophyte astronomer, computer programmer and office manager. His primary avocations are reading science-fiction and fantasy and promoting the international language Esperanto. He has successfully raised three daughters and a son, the oldest of whom (Gwen) is responsible for designing this site and giving it to him as a Christmas present. Movies are, for him, a pleasant way of passing an afternoon or evening; his only connection with the movie industry consists in a long-ago four week period during which he worked as an usher at the Lake Theater in Oswego, Oregon. Contact Don at don@harlows.org | ||||||||||