|
|
||||||||
| Home . 1998 Best . 1999 Best . 2000 Best . 2002 Best . 2003 Best . 2004 Best . 2006 Best . adventure . Animation . Biblical . Book . comedy . Documentary . drama . Esperanto . Essays . family . Fantasy . historical . Horror . Mixed Literature . Musical . Mystery . Novel . Novella . Play . Poetry . Romance . sci-fi . Short stories . Technical . TV . Western . all | ||||||||
Gipson is not nearly as innocent an individual as the trailer indicated, nor is Banek such an incorrigible sleazoid as one might expect after viewing the thirty-second introduction. Gavin Banek (Ben Affleck), who is working his way up through his father-in-law’s law firm, has been given the important responsibility of convincing a dying and probably senile old man to shift responsibility for a hundred-million-dollar trust from a committee of friends and well-wishers to the willins shoulders of the law firm’s top lawyers. Doyle Gipson (Samuel L. Jackson) is an alcoholic, now enrolled in AA, who has managed to alienate everyone, including his wife. Both are on their way to court — Banek to counter a suit by the now deceased old man’s granddaughter, Gipson to convince a judge that he deserves to have partial custody of his children. They meet on a New York freeway — crunch. Damage is not severe, but Gipson insists on going through proper procedures, while Banek is in a hurry — such a hurry that he inadvertently leaves a critical document lying on the freeway next to an enraged Gipson. The rest of the film has to do with Banek’s attempts to convince Gipson to return the document and Gipson’s attempts to get even with Banek for costing him a crucial twenty minutes — and his children. Probably the most outstanding thing about this film is that the trailer, as shown on TV, was totally misleading. Gipson is not nearly as innocent an individual as the trailer indicated, nor is Banek such an incorrigible sleazoid as one might expect after viewing the thirty-second introduction. In fact, one of the most attractive points about the film to me is that both men are allowed to redeem themselves before the conclusion and find ways to survive — happily — in a society that originally seemed determined to punish and/or corrupt them. On the other hand, little more can be said for it than that. I’d recommend renting the tape or DVD when it comes out. Don Harlow, May 29, 2002 09:25 PMFeedback
Leave a comment
|
Latest Reviews
» La Kiso
» Katrina malfruas » Inter tero kaj ĉielo » La nokta patrolo 2 » Moskvaj sonoriloj » Beletra Almanako » La bato » Sonetoj » Shrek the Third » Enlumiĝo » All reviews
Sign up
Sign up now to receive a notification
Subscribe to this site using an RSS (XML) news aggregator (?): » Full reviews » Review excerpts
Other sites
About this site
All rights reserved. Promotional images are displayed under fair use for review purposes only and are held under copyright by their respective owners. This site uses MT 3.15 Site templates and design © Gwen Harlow for her dad. |
|||||||
| Don Harlow bio info. Born longer ago than he cares to admit, Don Harlow has worked as a military weather forecaster, neophyte astronomer, computer programmer and office manager. His primary avocations are reading science-fiction and fantasy and promoting the international language Esperanto. He has successfully raised three daughters and a son, the oldest of whom (Gwen) is responsible for designing this site and giving it to him as a Christmas present. Movies are, for him, a pleasant way of passing an afternoon or evening; his only connection with the movie industry consists in a long-ago four week period during which he worked as an usher at the Lake Theater in Oswego, Oregon. Contact Don at don@harlows.org | ||||||||